Skip to main content
Detections

Gap Analysis

Find undefended ATT&CK techniques from Detections → Gap Analysis.

Detections → Gap Analysis identifies the specific points where your ATT&CK technique coverage and D3FEND defensive controls do not align. It cross-references the two frameworks using 305 technique-to-control mappings and surfaces the techniques that lack effective defense.

Open Gap Analysis

  1. Go to Detections → Gap Analysis.

Gap Analysis tab with coverage completeness and undefended techniques (dark mode)

Filters and Export

Filters at the top let you narrow results by:

  • Tactic — Filter by ATT&CK tactic (e.g., Initial Access, Lateral Movement)
  • Priority — Filter by remediation priority (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
  • Status — Tested or Untested

All filter state is synchronized with the URL, so filtered views can be bookmarked or shared. Open Export, then choose Export CSV or Export JSON.

Coverage Completeness

A donut chart visualizes how techniques break down across three coverage levels:

  • Fully Covered — At least one mapped D3FEND control is deployed and rated Effective or Highly Effective
  • Partially Covered — A D3FEND control is deployed but is not rated as effective
  • No Coverage — No mapped D3FEND control is deployed

Gap Summary Statistics

A statistics panel breaks down gaps by remediation priority and by ATT&CK tactic, giving a quick view of where the largest concentrations of gaps exist.

Priority is calculated from prevalence weight and defense status:

Condition

Priority

High prevalence (weight >= 2.0) and no defense deployed

Critical

High prevalence and Undetected test outcome

Critical

Medium prevalence (weight >= 1.5) or only Logged outcome

High

Standard prevalence (weight >= 1.0)

Medium

Low prevalence

Low

Undefended Techniques Table

The main table lists every ATT&CK technique that lacks effective defensive coverage. Columns include:

  • ATT&CK ID
  • Technique Name
  • Tactic
  • Testing Status — Tested or Untested
  • Outcome
  • Missing D3FEND — Number of recommended D3FEND controls not effectively deployed
  • Risk Score — 0-100 composite of prevalence weight, defense status, and test outcome
  • Priority — Remediation priority level

Clicking a row opens a drawer for that technique: which D3FEND controls are recommended, their current presence and effectiveness status, and specific remediation guidance.

Ineffective Controls Table

A collapsible section below the main table lists D3FEND controls that are deployed but not performing effectively. Each entry shows:

  • The D3FEND technique name and current effectiveness rating
  • How many ATT&CK techniques it is supposed to protect against
  • A recommended action: Tune (for Partially Effective controls) or Replace (for Ineffective controls)

Use this table to decide which controls to tune or replace.

Support

If the gap list looks empty on a live tenant, confirm hunts have run, then reach out to support@praetorian.com.